Xerces 3.1.2 Release Candidate available

[Cantor, Scott]

I have prepared a hopefully-final distribution for testing [1] as a release candidate. The filenames are identical to the eventual release.

I fixed the distribution last night to include all missing content that was present in the 3.1.1 distribution, including the HTML site and API docs. If anything is still missing, please let us know.



This distribution also contains the old tools/ directory for building the site, because the distribution was big enough already without it making much difference. One less separate file to post.

There are no code changes between beta-2 or beta-3 and this release, only distribution content.

-- Scott

[1] https://people.apache.org/~scantor/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m

[Denis Excoffier]

Post by Cantor, Scott
I have prepared a hopefully-final distribution for testing [1] as a release candidate. The filenames are identical to the eventual release.
I fixed the distribution last night to include all missing content that was present in the 3.1.1 distribution, including the HTML site and API docs. If anything is still missing, please let us know.

Not missing ones i guess but extra ones. I suppose the following files should not be present in the gz and bz2 distributions:

m4/._libtool.m4
m4/._ltoptions.m4
m4/._ltsugar.m4
m4/._lt~obsolete.m4

The zip distribution does not include them.

By the way, could we please also get a xerces-c-3.1.2.tar.xz distribution, in addition to or instead the bz2 distribution?

Regards,

Denis Excoffier.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org

[Cantor, Scott]

Post by Denis Excoffier
Not missing ones i guess but extra ones. I suppose the following files should
m4/._libtool.m4
m4/._ltoptions.m4
m4/._ltsugar.m4
m4/._lt~obsolete.m4

I hadn't actually found where they came from. Might be a Mac thing. Probably not worth worrying over unless I actually have to rebuild...

Post by Denis Excoffier
By the way, could we please also get a xerces-c-3.1.2.tar.xz distribution, in
addition to or instead the bz2 distribution?

Does automake support it? I guess I can add that and rebuild another RC if it's important enough.

-- Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org

[Cantor, Scott]

Post by Cantor, Scott
Does automake support it? I guess I can add that and rebuild another RC if it's
important enough.

(For context, the only reason I added bz2 was that I package this for some SUSE platforms, and they're probably going to start warning me at the build service about not having bz2 sources.)

-- Scott



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-***@xerces.apache.org

[Cantor, Scott]

Post by Cantor, Scott

Post by Denis Excoffier
By the way, could we please also get a xerces-c-3.1.2.tar.xz distribution, in
addition to or instead the bz2 distribution?

Does automake support it? I guess I can add that and rebuild another RC if it's important enough.

I saw that this is also built-in. In the interest of stability, I'm leaving the automake file alone for now and I just manually generated a distribution with make dist-xz and posted it, it's the same distribution as the others.

Once the release is done, I'll tweak the makefile to include it going forward. If we don't have binaries, the least we can do is accomodate formats.

-- Scott

B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB��[��X��ܚX�KK[XZ[��Y]�][��X��ܚX�P\��\˘\X�K�ܙ�B��܈Y][ۘ[��[X[��K[